<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rhino 3D: Building a symmetrical free-form product (Part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.studiorola.com/tutorials/3d-modeling/rhino-3d-building-a-symmetrical-free-form-product-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.studiorola.com/tutorials/3d-modeling/rhino-3d-building-a-symmetrical-free-form-product-part-2/</link>
	<description>3D Graphics &#38; Industrial Design services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:35:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.studiorola.com/tutorials/3d-modeling/rhino-3d-building-a-symmetrical-free-form-product-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studiorola.com/tutorials/3d-modeling/rhino-3d-building-a-symmetrical-free-form-product-part-2/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Ok, here&#039;s a work around:

If I loft the two generation curves, then dupedge, and use these as the rails (with handle curves closed on both ends) it works.  Would love it if I knew why I had to do that extra step - which changed the curves anyway (without &#039;do not simplify&#039; checked&#039;; but the precision doesn&#039;t matter at this point...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, here&#8217;s a work around:</p>
<p>If I loft the two generation curves, then dupedge, and use these as the rails (with handle curves closed on both ends) it works.  Would love it if I knew why I had to do that extra step &#8211; which changed the curves anyway (without &#8216;do not simplify&#8217; checked&#8217;; but the precision doesn&#8217;t matter at this point&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.studiorola.com/tutorials/3d-modeling/rhino-3d-building-a-symmetrical-free-form-product-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studiorola.com/tutorials/3d-modeling/rhino-3d-building-a-symmetrical-free-form-product-part-2/#comment-336</guid>
		<description>Questions:

1. When making the two cross-section curves with &#039;control point curve&#039;, how are you keeping the curves touching the ends of the &#039;generation curves&#039;?  The only way I know how is to make two separate curves for each side, then join them...is there a better way? I tried &#039;curve - interpolate points&#039;, but it doesn&#039;t stay on the generation curve ends with any editing; curve by handles is awkward but workable...any suggestions?

2. After making 4 cross-section curves and joining the pairs, when I try &#039;sweep 2&#039;, picking the two rails, then two joined cross-section curve pairs, I get &#039;Sweep2 failed to make a surface&#039;.  Is this because each cross-section curve is actually two joined curves?  When I try single curves (not joined, from &#039;handles&#039;) for the cross-section curves, I also get &#039;sweep2 failed to make a surface&#039;; when I try only choosing one of the cross-sections, I get the same thing.  Flipping which curves are &#039;rail&#039; and &#039;cross-section&#039; make a surface, but not the one we want...and drawing un-joined pairs fails with &#039;Unable to sweep - Two shapes are too close together&#039;...any advice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Questions:</p>
<p>1. When making the two cross-section curves with &#8216;control point curve&#8217;, how are you keeping the curves touching the ends of the &#8216;generation curves&#8217;?  The only way I know how is to make two separate curves for each side, then join them&#8230;is there a better way? I tried &#8216;curve &#8211; interpolate points&#8217;, but it doesn&#8217;t stay on the generation curve ends with any editing; curve by handles is awkward but workable&#8230;any suggestions?</p>
<p>2. After making 4 cross-section curves and joining the pairs, when I try &#8217;sweep 2&#8242;, picking the two rails, then two joined cross-section curve pairs, I get &#8216;Sweep2 failed to make a surface&#8217;.  Is this because each cross-section curve is actually two joined curves?  When I try single curves (not joined, from &#8216;handles&#8217;) for the cross-section curves, I also get &#8217;sweep2 failed to make a surface&#8217;; when I try only choosing one of the cross-sections, I get the same thing.  Flipping which curves are &#8216;rail&#8217; and &#8216;cross-section&#8217; make a surface, but not the one we want&#8230;and drawing un-joined pairs fails with &#8216;Unable to sweep &#8211; Two shapes are too close together&#8217;&#8230;any advice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3D Industrial Design &#187; Rhino 3D: Building a symmetrical free-form product (Part 3)</title>
		<link>http://www.studiorola.com/tutorials/3d-modeling/rhino-3d-building-a-symmetrical-free-form-product-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>3D Industrial Design &#187; Rhino 3D: Building a symmetrical free-form product (Part 3)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studiorola.com/tutorials/3d-modeling/rhino-3d-building-a-symmetrical-free-form-product-part-2/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here to go back to Part 2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here to go back to Part 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3D Industrial Design &#187; Rhino 3D: Building a symmetrical free-form product (Part 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.studiorola.com/tutorials/3d-modeling/rhino-3d-building-a-symmetrical-free-form-product-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>3D Industrial Design &#187; Rhino 3D: Building a symmetrical free-form product (Part 1)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.studiorola.com/tutorials/3d-modeling/rhino-3d-building-a-symmetrical-free-form-product-part-2/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>[...] &gt;&gt;&gt; Click here to go to Part 2 of this tutorial.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &gt;&gt;&gt; Click here to go to Part 2 of this tutorial.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

